Employment Law

Last month,[1] we posted an article that described the challenge businesses faced due to a Department of Labor (DOL) regulation (the “2024 Rule”) that was set to require employers to raise the minimum salary paid to most exempt employees for a second time in six months. The second phase of the 2024 Rule, which would require a salary of $58,656, was set to become effective on January 1, 2025. Now, thanks to a federal court in Texas employers are no longer required to raise salaries comply this new DOL rule. Last Friday, the Court ruled [2] that the DOL’s 2024 […]

In the workplace, an employee is considered “exempt” or a “non-exempt” based on the employee’s specific job duties, and the manner and amount of compensation paid.  Only non-exempt employees are eligible for overtime pay according to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FSLA”).  The Department of Labor’s (DOL) has announced that the minimum salary to qualify for overtime exempt status will increase to $58,656 effective January 1, 2025. For some businesses the only option will be to comply by raising employee salaries to at least this new minimum level.  However, it is not the only option and businesses should consider carefully […]

Article originally published by Valley Business Front in Issue 193, October 2024: Valley Business FRONT, Issue 193, October 2024. In the 35 years that I have represented Virginia businesses and executives in workplace matters and litigation, I have lost count as to the number of times I have heard someone say words to the effect that non-compete agreements are “unlawful” in Virginia. (Spoiler alert: they can be lawful.) This article provides answers, and an update. As a General Statement, Non-Compete Agreements may be Valid in Virginia if Narrowly Tailored to Prevent Direct Competition. It is true that restraints against competition […]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Ada E. Brown ruled that the FTC’s Final Rule banning non-compete agreements (the “Rule”), which was set to take effect on September 4, 2024, was “promulgated . . . in excess of [the FTC’s] statutory authority.”  Ryan LLC, v. Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-00986-E (N.D. Tex. 2024). As a result, the Court held that, consistent with Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) § 706(2)(A)-(C), the Rule would be “set aside.” Critically, the Court concluded, based on “a couple of recent cases,” that “setting aside agency action under § 706 has ‘nationwide effect,’ is ‘not […]

Article co-written by Ryan Starks, David Paxton, and Summer Associate Haley Leipzig On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued a Final Rule (the “Rule”) that will enact a “comprehensive ban on non-competes with all workers” as of September 4, 2024.[1]  The Rule aims to prohibit employers from using or enforcing non-compete agreements with employees or independent contractors when their employment ends, in order to address what the FTC deems “unfair methods of restricting competition.”[2]  The full text of the Rule can be accessed here.[3]. If the FTC rule becomes effective, it will supersede and supplant Virginia law […]

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued a Final Rule which provides that it is an “unfair method of competition” for employers to enter into non-compete clauses with their workers after August 21, 2024—or 120 days after the Final Rule is published in the Federal Register.  The Final Rule is available here.  The Final Rule was issued after the FTC received more than 26,000 public comments in response to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued in January 2023. While the ban is scheduled to take effect 120 days after the Final Rule is published in the Federal […]

On February 8, 2024, a unanimous United States Supreme Court ruled that whistleblowers bringing a retaliatory discharge claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) are not required to prove that the employer acted with “retaliatory intent,” but need only prove that their “protected activity” was a “contributing factor” in the employer’s unfavorable personnel action.  The ruling reversed a Second Circuit decision which had overturned a $900,000 jury verdict in favor of a former employee against UBS Securities, LLC.[1] The Court’s ruling is yet another disappointment for businesses hoping for greater judicial protection from the growing number of retaliation claims.[2] Justice Sotomayor’s […]